Role
UX Designer
Context
UC Berkeley Human-Centered Design course project
Timeline
April 2020
Team
Solo project
Problem
Solution
Background
BART, or the Bay Area Rapid Transit subway system, is the cheapest way to get around the Bay Area while avoiding driving in heavy commuter traffic. Many Bay Area residents hesitate to take advantage of this transportation option.
User interviews reveal consistent stress when taking BART
Many Bay Area residents hesitate to take advantage of this transportation option. 12 BART users were interviewed to better understand how the experience of riding BART could be more appealing.
Based on these interviews, the journey map below indicates the level of stress that a BART rider undergoes at each step of the travel experience.
Issues that users have with BART:
Riders do not want to refill Clipper cards at machines at the station because they are outdated, slow, and confusing.
The trains and stations are visibly dirty and unsanitary.
Riders do not feel safe at stations or on trains.
Prioritizing only the most impactful features
Key features
"Refill your Clipper" & "Purchase a ticket" 💸
→ So that riders don’t have to use the station machines
"File a cleanliness concern" 🧹
→ So that stations are cleaned more frequently
"Emergency button" (call BART police) 🚨
→ So that riders feel protected
Rethinking the "Emergency button"
Wireframes and initial user testing
Insights from testing—Users didn’t understand the features and system statuses
"Is there a way to add the selected amount to my card? I don't see a button.”
"I would like to see a confirmation message after submitting a cleanliness concern."
"Is refilling my clipper card and purchasing a ticket the same thing?"
Final solution: Giving the user more information in high fidelity prototype
File a cleanliness concern feature
If I could go back, I would…
Do competitive analyses, especially for the emergency button, to draw inspiration for what a user’s mental model may look like for each feature before jumping into design
Conduct concept validation testing with the high fidelity prototype instead of just the low fidelity prototypes. Low fidelity prototypes are harder for users to interpret, so they may have clearer or stronger opinions based on a more realistic visual representation.
Get a quantitative metric for how likely people would’ve rode BART without this app vs. with this app to obtain a clear measure of success.
Do more design explorations of the other features and screens besides the emergency button.